The Importance of Compliance
Companies Can’t Afford to Underestimate It
By Joan Padduck and Philip Spayd
Over the past 3 decades, more and more companies have recognized
the importance of customs and regulatory compliance. In the United
States and the rest of the developed world, national customs organizations
have developed formal programs to encourage, and also to require,
a high degree of regulatory compliance. There are, to varying degrees,
incentives in terms of reduced customs inspections for companies
with high rates of compliance. Much changed, but much remained
the same, in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September11.
While there is now an international emphasis on supply chain security,
compliance remains the foundation on which security is built.
The importance of compliance has changed in another important
respect. In a legal sense, corporate officers of publicly held
companies are responsible under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for the
accuracy of their books, and for disclosing material weaknesses
that could adversely impact on the company’s performance.
Failure to comply with government regulations covering the importation
or exportation of goods by negligence can result in substantial
monetary penalties against the company, and could affect the bottom
line. Failure to comply when intentionally done can result not
only in monetary damages but in criminal prosecution. In the social
setting, corporate executives are being held accountable for the
actions of their firms by the media and the public. A compliance
breach in which the health or safety of a product is called into
question or where a product was made by prison labor will quickly
become public knowledge in our era of news blogs and instant media.
There are no longer any company secrets.
Most medium to large size importers now have a Compliance Department
comprised of at least a middle management level person (Manager
or Director) with support staff sufficient to ensure correct classification
and value of their imports, adherence to the US customs and tariff
regulations, and the myriad requirements of other government agencies.
Some smaller importers still rely on a Traffic Manager or other
logistics or purchasing staff to ensure customs and regulatory
compliance. In the past this may have been adequate, but no longer.
In the post 9/11 global trade environment, there are complex and
numerous customs, regulatory and other legal requirements that
must be met. Compliance is increasingly difficult when it is an
adjunct to someone’s primary responsibilities. Third parties
are often employed by small to medium size companies, but the importer
needs to remember that compliance is ultimately their responsibility.
Just as a senior executive can not longer dodge compliance issue
by saying she was uninformed, neither can a company presume that
its broker or legal advisor has everything under control.
Due to the legal and public relations implications of non-compliance,
many of the largest Fortune 500 multinational companies have centralized
their global customs and regulatory compliance responsibilities
within the US corporate headquarters structure. Take, for example,
a US based company which has business units in Europe. What if
one of their business units starts sourcing from or selling to
a Cuban company? Depending upon the relationship between the US
based company and their European business unit, the US based company
could very possibly be subject to penalties imposed by the US Government
under the “Trading With the Enemy Act”. If the European
business units are permitted to operate without the oversight or
involvement of the US based headquarters office, this trade could
occur without the knowledge or consent of the US based company,
but would still expose the US based company to severe penalties.
Criminal penalties for violating the sanctions of the Trading With
the Enemy Act range up to 10 years in prison, $1 Million in corporate
fines, $250,000 in individual fines and civil penalties up to $55,000
per violation. What corporate executive wants to see his picture
in the media after he and his firm have been convicted of “trading
with the enemy?”
By centralizing global customs and regulatory compliance responsibilities
within the US corporate headquarters structure, these types of
transactions could be identified when the purchase order is placed,
presuming proper internal controls are in place, and stopped before
any violations could occur. This may appear to be an extreme example
of the benefits of centralization, but note that Spain, France,
Italy, Russia, and The Netherlands are some of Cuba’s largest
trading partners. If your company has subsidiaries or divisions
operating independently in any of those countries, are they aware
of the restrictions on the US trade with Cuba? Some may not be
aware, and some may be aware but may not understand the implications
of those restrictions for the off-shore subsidiaries or divisions.
Cuba’s exports include a wide variety of goods including
tobacco products, fish and agricultural products. Their imports
include manufactured goods, automobiles and other transportation
machinery and equipment, food products, chemicals and many more.
If your company has subsidiaries or divisions operating independently
in other countries, this may be an area to explore. It may possibly
be a good reason to recommend centralization of your customs and
regulatory compliance responsibilities.
Critical and Complex
The Compliance Manager for the small to medium size importer has
a different set of challenges, if that role even exists. In our
era of relentless cost cutting, compliance is sometimes considered
an overhead position that can be done without. Often, the senior
management of those smaller companies does not realize or understand
the critical and complex role of customs and regulatory compliance.
Others may not have the organizational structure or budget to support
the staffing needed to ensure compliance. An important message
for those senior managers: Importing is a right, not a privilege
and your right to import can be terminated for cause at any time.
It would, of course, take serious infractions to get to that point,
but it emphasizes the importance of compliance.
The role and functions of the Compliance Manager must be highly
integrated into the organization, in much the same way as the Sales
or Marketing Manager, Finance Manager, Distribution and/or Operations
Manager. The organizational support for this function must also
be carefully developed to ensure that the number of support staff
as well as their expertise can support the size and complexity
of the import program. The compliance manager must have the support
of senior executives within the company. It needs to be made clear
to other operational managers that the compliance manager is responsible
for the company’s compliance with the many arcane provisions
that exist in the tariff schedules and within international trade
agreements. There are very complex regulations applicable to various
commodities which are enforced by US Customs and Border Protection
and which include other government agencies’ regulations
such as the Food and Drug Administration, the
Federal Trade Commission, Fish and Wildlife
and the Department of Agriculture.
The Compliance Manager must be aware of the requirements and regulations
of each of the regulatory agencies and how or if those regulations
may apply to the imports of their company. For example, an apparel
importer may import cotton sweaters. This may seem relatively easy
and straight forward, but if the sweaters have buttons made from
shells, there are Fish and Wildlife implications. This can impact
the selection of ports of entry because the importer will want
to select a port which has F&W inspectors on sight in order
to clear the goods for delivery in an expeditious manner. In addition,
certain certificates may be required or customs entry will be denied.
If the Traffic Manager or other logistics or purchasing staff responsible
for overseeing the compliance functions is not aware of the issues
or does not know the right questions to ask, there could be significant
delays and related costs incurred. Compliance, therefore, does
not lend itself to being a collateral duty of an employee who does
not have the expertise to know the four corners of the regulatory
processes. In today’s business environment, these additional
costs and delays will result in significant competitive disadvantages
for the uninformed importer.
In the post 9/11 environment, the Compliance Manager must also
stay abreast of the requirements and details of many pieces of
security related legislation and cognizant of how new legislation
might impact the company’s imports or their selection of
supply chain partners. Legislation such as The Bioterrorism Act
of 2002 can have far-reaching implications
that may not on its face appear relevant to some importers. The
BTA assigns the Food & Drug Administration with the responsibility
of protecting the food and beverage supply that comes into or
passes through the United States against potential acts of terrorism.
Under the BTA, certain third party logistics providers are required
to register with the FDA, and failure to comply with this could
cause an importers’ shipments to be detained and possibly
denied entry into the United States. Other pieces of legislation
which have been passed and could impact certain decisions made
by the Compliance Manager include The International Ship and
Port Security Code, The Known Shipper Rule and The Sarbanes-Oxley
Act.
Canada, the European Union and the Asian Pacific Economic Council
are developing similar security regulations and a corporate Compliance
Manager for multinational companies must remain up to date on
those regulations as well. The World Customs Organization has
adopted
the Framework to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade. While the
WCO cannot require its members to comply, it is widely thought
that this will become the international standard for cargo security
in global trade.
A Catalyst in the Company
The Compliance Manager should also be the catalyst in the company
to determine to what degree the company will participate in voluntary
programs administered by US Customs and Border Protection.
The Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism
and the Importer Self Assessment are two
such voluntary programs. However, a significant investment of
time is
required in the preparation phase for participation in these
programs. The Compliance Manager will need to ensure that proper
procedures
are in place within the company as well as with all supply chain
partners, including standard operating procedures and internal
controls for all parties to the transactions.
In March of 2005, CBP announced mandatory requirements for all
C-TPAT importers and their supply chain partners, effective in
September. C-TPAT members can expect increased scrutiny over
the compliance with those requirements as CBP ramps up the validation
process by increasing the number of supply chain specialists
on
board. Furthermore, Commissioner Robert Bonner has indicated
that, in the event of an “incident” which causes
partial or total port closures, validated C-TPAT participants
shipping
through ports that participate in the CBP’s Container Security
Initiative will receive priority over companies who are not C-TPAT
participants when deciding whose shipments will move first. This
will have tremendous value to the importers who are able to continue
operations in the face of such an incident.
The role of today’s compliance manager is diverse, complex
and must be integrated into the operations of the company, regardless
of how large or small the company may be. The actions and decisions
of the Compliance Manager impact many departments and functions
within the company; from finance to purchasing, procurement,
research, design and development, from sales to operations and
logistics,
legal and security. The Compliance Manager’s responsibilities
include determination of product classification, duty rates and
fees, recommendations on the design of products in order to obtain
the lowest duty rate possible, ensuring that the clearance process
is seamless and timely and validating that the various logistics
partners are compliant with Customs and OGA requirements.
The compliance manager needs to remain up to date on new and
changing laws and regulations because ignorance is not an acceptable
excuse
for non-compliance. Because of the diversity of their role,
the Compliance Manager must work diligently to break down the silos
which exist in companies of all sizes, and must institute cross-functional
processes to ensure compliance to all customs, regulatory and
legislative requirements.
This is not a job for the meek of
heart.
It should
not be underestimated by the senior management of companies
involved in international trade today. This is a job for an ethical,
strong,
flexible, influential, intelligent, committed individual
who can build consensus among departments with the goal of ensuring
that
the hard work and effort of all the various departments within
the company is not jeopardized or compromised by an incident
of non-compliance.
Joan Padduck and Phil Spayd are directors at Global Trade
Systems, Inc.
They can be reached at (508) 954-9108.